Comments on: India’s Freedom for Gays Means Choices for Eunuchs

By: Wil Robinson

Wil Robinson — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 04:22:38 +0000

Nunya -
There definitely is a similarity between the flair of Southern California and eunuch’s penchant for the outrageous…

By: nunya

nunya — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:13:58 +0000

I was laughing as you describe the eunuch’s behaviour because it reminded me of about half of Hollywood.

By: janelle

janelle — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:05:05 +0000

fascinating. i loved the taxi story… x j

By: Wil Robinson

Wil Robinson — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:01:07 +0000

Bill–

I sometimes think moderation is all relative.

Incidentally, I realized today that, because the Indian government stays out of the marriage business, this ruling effectively means gay couples can now get married, provided they can find a temple/priest/whomever to do the rights.

And already some have. Interesting - they seem to have skipped a step that the U.S. is still stuck on.

But I guess that has more to do with the U.S. income tax system and the government tax codes that make “marriage” a secular matter of the state rather than a religious and personal matter.

By: Bill

Bill — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:38:28 +0000

Progress seems an elusive concept most of the time. And as conservative values are on the up-tick, globally speaking, any country which passes laws lifting any type of discrimination come off as incredibly forward thinking. And, that’s only because of the general disparity of the human condition.

I wonder if we will ever attain a level of true moderation and compassion?