The Evolution of Middle Eastern Terrorism
January 13th, 2009 by Wil Robinson
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
–George Santayana
There has been much chatter among the media (and the propaganda artists that serve as their meal tickets) about Hamas using the civilian population of Gaza as human shields.
Israel justifies the bombing of the UN school(s), the killing of more than a dozen ambulance drivers in Gaza, and every one of the 850+ men, women, and children’s deaths by citing Hamas’ illegal tactics. The Israeli government claims Hamas is refusing to stand up and fight the honorable fight, instead hiding among their own people for protection, using ambulances to move militants throughout the territory, and hiding weapons in schools.
I thought now was a good time to review the memoirs of one of the first terrorists to operate in Middle East. The father of contemporary terrorism – a man who proudly claimed responsibility for dozens of innocent lives in hotel bombings and militant attacks – was one of the first to lay out a strategy on how to conduct a terrorist campaign.
This guru of Middle Eastern terror recorded his lessons on using a civilian population for protection, promoting a martyrdom cult among followers, using the media to manipulate public sympathy, justifying even the most illegal behaviors, kidnapping hostages to extract concessions, and killing the enemy – even if they were civilians.
Over the decades, these themes and tactics have been revised, revamped, and improved to maximize effect. Every subsequent terrorist group, from Algeria’s FLN to Pakistan’s LeT, has integrated these lessons into their own operations.
And Hamas, who today is waging their own terrorist campaign against Israel, are following a blueprint left by the pater familias of modern terrorism.
Here are a few chilling excerpts from his memoirs:
- On martyrdom:
“[The] capacity for sacrifice is the measure of revolt and the father of victory…there is no greater force than the readiness for self-sacrifice…”
“The individual identified himself utterly with the idea. If it meant the surrender of his personal liberty – he surrendered it; if it required that he leave his family – he left it; if it involved the endurance of torture – he accepted it; if it demanded his life – he gave it.”
“There was no alternative, except submission to oppression.”
“I know what awaits me but I am sure that my death will bring us one step nearer victory.”
“We march to death proudly.”
- On media manipulation:
“[The enemy] continued to call us by the name which…suggested bravery on our part and fear on theirs. They called us ‘terrorists’ to the end.”
“We translated our broadcasts into foreign languages and distributed them among the foreign newspaper correspondents and foreign diplomatic representatives…This was important in keeping the…problem in the focus of international attention…We decided to exploit the psychological weapon to the utmost.”
- On hiding among civilians:
“It never occurred to the [enemy] that we lived in the country as we did: almost openly…We were teachers and students, real or imaginary. We were real or imaginary merchants or bookkeepers. We were engineers and mechanics. We were…everyday citizens indistinguishable from other citizens.”
“The people gave the underground what the country’s natural conditions failed to give: cover.”
- On civilian targets:
“And the civilians who had disregarded our warnings, suffered inevitable casualties.”
“What is most necessary is the inner consciousnesses that makes what is ‘legal’ illegal and the ‘illegal’ legal and justified….We were convinced of the absolute legality of our ‘illegal’ actions.”
- On justification for terrorism:
“This is the paradox in the life of every man who fights in a just cause. He puts on a heavy…yoke, in order to throw off a yoke. He makes war so that there should be peace. He punishes himself so that there should be no suffering. He employs physical force and believes in moral force. He sheds blood so that there should be no more bloodshed…He sacrifices his life – in order to ensure life.”
These quotes were taken from Menachem Begin’s The Revolt, written in 1951. Begin was a former leader of the Irgun Zvai Leumi, a Jewish terrorist organization formed in 1931 in British-mandated Palestine.
The group used terrorism to defeat the British occupiers that led to the establishment of a Jewish state in 1948. Menachem Begin went on to become Israel’s prime minister from 1977-1983.
If it worked for Israel…
But I’m sure comparisons of the Irgun Zvai Leumi and Hamas are merely coincidental.
Tags: Israel, collateral damage, Hamas, human shields, Gaza![[...propaganda poster of the Irgun...]](http://www.internationalpoliticalwill.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/180px-irgun1.jpg)
Thank you for this info. I have known for a long time that Begin was considered a terrorist by the British, a fact that seems to have been missed by many people who supported Israel and the media.I, however, did not know that he wrote that manifesto and for enlightening me I thank you. I just wish many more people read your website.
I stumbled unto your site through “World Have Your Say” of the BBC, which quoted your blog on George Wills interview on ABC.
Sita–
Thanks for stopping by. I also wish many people read my website…
Looking at the timeline, there is significant evidence to show that the Algerian FLN in the 50s based their tactics on the Irgun…which in turn, acted as a template for Fatah in the 60s…etc. etc.
Great article!
Indeed we are forgetting where the notion of terrorism came from.
Great article, I´m in grad school studying National Security Studies, with a concentration in terrorism studies. We constantly talk about Islamic radical terrorists groups. Even in our books, they really don´t mention Israeli terrorists organizations. They do mention Begin and Shamir as being terrorists but it goes no further. I´m going to put this out to them next time. Watch the entire class go silent. LMAO, Good job.
u know who–
Glad I could help. I actually came across the quotes while writing a paper in undergrad school for a Israel/Palestine Conflict course. The prof taught in Gaza and the West Bank in the 80s, and was more neutral than most professors who seem to think it’s all the Arabs fault.
Which university are you studying at?
And do I really know you? Now I’m curious.
I thought you had my email addy. I´m in grad school
in Manassass Va.
There is this professor Daniel Pipes, he has a website where he basically says Arabs are the cause of these problems. Of course, he does this in subtle way. He has many interesting articles and blogs.
I asked him to post what you had on your website.
You know he didn´t post it. I was cracking up laughing. You know the truth is powerful. People
don´t want to hear the truth no matter what color they are. It´s funny.
Once again good job, I´m so glad I found your website. I´m sure you will have more articles to inform people that want to know the truth and that are objective thinkers. Being subjective doesn´t work when it comes to facts and history.